Availability of supplements normalizes their presence in the training regimens of

Availability of supplements normalizes their presence in the training regimens of non-elite runners. These processes of normalization mean that over time athletes who engage with the risk on a day-to-day basis consider the overall health risksNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSurveill Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 November 04.HenningPageto be mundane (Albert 1999). Maughan, Greenhaff, and Hespel (2011) caution that as athletes become more and more desensitized to taking and using supplements, they will initially exercise caution in order to minimize health risks from novel supplements that lack in institutional research on their efficacy and safety, which erodes gradually over time as their use of these supplements becomes routine. Surveillance and Discipline of Runners The bodies of runners are on display when they BUdR price compete in races. This visibility allows fellow runners, coaches, the media, fans, and sports officials to engage in various forms of surveillance (Foucault 1979) that involve viewing and judging the athletes’ performances and bodies. This “normalizing gaze” enables the classification of runners as either normal or pathological and the formal regulation or punishment of those who appear to transgress normative bounds. Elite runners’ bodies are further made visible via blood and urine antidoping tests. As anti-doping efforts rely increasingly on biological surveillance systems, intimately personal markers of doping that were previously invisible are rendered visible. For elite athletes, testing has led to a shift from surveilling what is visible on the body to surveillance of what is made visible from within the body. Anti-doping surveillance technologies in sport normalize the ideal of the “clean” athlete who embodies what WADA describes as the “spirit of sport.” This “spirit” includes such values as fair play, honesty, good health, and excellence in performance (WADA Code 2009, p.14). These values simultaneously pathologize any athlete who departs from this standard through doping or use of PEDs. The inner self of the athlete is also implicated in biological test results. A doping test not only reveals a biological truth of the individual, but the test is also read as a visible manifestation of the athlete’s inner psychic self (Grosz 1994). Deleuze (1998) posited that what we can say about bodies depends to a large extent on what we can see, and what we can see is bound up in the underlying discourses that actively produce and establish the truth of the subjects for which they speak. Such biological discourses are “regimes of knowledge that lay down the conditions of possibility for thinking and speaking”. However, “at any particular time, only some statements come to be recognized as `true'” (Entwistle 2000, 17). Thus, biological anti-doping regimes produce the truth of what constitutes athletes as a group, as well as the acceptable behaviors and ways of being an individual athlete. No longer reliant on the exterior visual field of athletic bodies, biological testing allows the truth of the inner self of the athlete to be read from formerly invisible matter through a microscope (Deleuze 1988). Body and self become indistinguishable, then are categorized as normal in the case of a negative test, or pathological if banned substances are found. In this way, doping tests shift the normalizing gaze to establishing the rightness or Resiquimod custom synthesis wrongness of an athlete’s character. For r.Availability of supplements normalizes their presence in the training regimens of non-elite runners. These processes of normalization mean that over time athletes who engage with the risk on a day-to-day basis consider the overall health risksNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSurveill Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 November 04.HenningPageto be mundane (Albert 1999). Maughan, Greenhaff, and Hespel (2011) caution that as athletes become more and more desensitized to taking and using supplements, they will initially exercise caution in order to minimize health risks from novel supplements that lack in institutional research on their efficacy and safety, which erodes gradually over time as their use of these supplements becomes routine. Surveillance and Discipline of Runners The bodies of runners are on display when they compete in races. This visibility allows fellow runners, coaches, the media, fans, and sports officials to engage in various forms of surveillance (Foucault 1979) that involve viewing and judging the athletes’ performances and bodies. This “normalizing gaze” enables the classification of runners as either normal or pathological and the formal regulation or punishment of those who appear to transgress normative bounds. Elite runners’ bodies are further made visible via blood and urine antidoping tests. As anti-doping efforts rely increasingly on biological surveillance systems, intimately personal markers of doping that were previously invisible are rendered visible. For elite athletes, testing has led to a shift from surveilling what is visible on the body to surveillance of what is made visible from within the body. Anti-doping surveillance technologies in sport normalize the ideal of the “clean” athlete who embodies what WADA describes as the “spirit of sport.” This “spirit” includes such values as fair play, honesty, good health, and excellence in performance (WADA Code 2009, p.14). These values simultaneously pathologize any athlete who departs from this standard through doping or use of PEDs. The inner self of the athlete is also implicated in biological test results. A doping test not only reveals a biological truth of the individual, but the test is also read as a visible manifestation of the athlete’s inner psychic self (Grosz 1994). Deleuze (1998) posited that what we can say about bodies depends to a large extent on what we can see, and what we can see is bound up in the underlying discourses that actively produce and establish the truth of the subjects for which they speak. Such biological discourses are “regimes of knowledge that lay down the conditions of possibility for thinking and speaking”. However, “at any particular time, only some statements come to be recognized as `true'” (Entwistle 2000, 17). Thus, biological anti-doping regimes produce the truth of what constitutes athletes as a group, as well as the acceptable behaviors and ways of being an individual athlete. No longer reliant on the exterior visual field of athletic bodies, biological testing allows the truth of the inner self of the athlete to be read from formerly invisible matter through a microscope (Deleuze 1988). Body and self become indistinguishable, then are categorized as normal in the case of a negative test, or pathological if banned substances are found. In this way, doping tests shift the normalizing gaze to establishing the rightness or wrongness of an athlete’s character. For r.