Logy. Nature 2001, 413(6852):157-161. 60. Nardi F, Spinsanti G, Boore JL, Carapelli A, Dallai R,

Logy. Nature 2001, 413(6852):157-161. 60. Nardi F, Spinsanti G, Boore JL, Carapelli A, Dallai R, Frati F: Hexapod origins: Monophyletic or paraphyletic Science 2003, 299(5614):1887-1889. 61. Mallatt JM, Garey JR, Shultz JW: Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: 1st use of practically complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2003, 31:178-191. 62. Regier JC, Shultz JW, Kambic RE: Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods aren’t monophyletic. 2005, 272(1561):395-401. 63. Serb JM, Oakley TH: Hierarchical phylogenetics as a quantitative analytical framework for Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Bioessays 2005, 27(11). 64. Pappu KS, Mardon G: Genetic manage of retinal specification and determination in Drosophila. The International journal of developmental biology 2004, 48(8-9):913-924. 65. Pappu KS, Chen R, Middlebrooks BW, Woo C, Heberlein U, Mardon G: Mechanism of hedgehog signaling through Drosophila eye improvement. Development 2003, 130(13):3053-3062. 66. Chang T, Mazotta J, Dumstrei K, Dumitrescu A, Hartenstein V: Dpp and Hh signaling within the Drosophila embryonic eye field. Development 2001, 128(23):4691-4704. 67. Pignoni F, Hu B, Zavitz KH, Xiao J, Garrity PA, Zipursky SL: The eyespecification proteins So and Eya form a complicated and regulate a number of actions in Drosophila eye development [published Norgestimate In stock erratum seems in Cell 1998 Feb 20;92(four):following 585]. Cell 1997, 91(7):881-891. 68. Conant GC, Wolfe KH: Functional partitioning of yeast co-expression networks just after genome duplication. Plos Biol 2006, 4(four):545-554. 69. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a brand new generation of protein database search applications. Nucleic Acids Study 1997, 25(17):3389-3402. 70. Edgar RC: MUSCLE: various sequence alignment with higher accuracy and higher throughput. Nucleic Acids Investigation 2004, 32(5):1792-1797. 71. Anisimova M, Gascuel O: Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A speedy, correct, and highly effective alternative. Syst Biol 2006, 55(4):539-552. 72. Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, speedy, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 2003, 52(five):696-704. 73. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM: The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992, 8(3):275-282. 74. Web page RDM, Charleston MA: From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees as well as the gene 6-Hydroxynicotinic acid Endogenous Metabolite treespecies tree problem. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1997, 7(2):231-240. 75. Web page RDM, Charleston MA: Trees within trees: phylogeny and historical associations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1998, 13(9):356-359. 76. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M: CONSEL: for assessing the self-confidence of phylogenetic tree choice. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(12):1246-1247. 77. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hao L, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, et al: CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain loved ones evaluation. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, , 35 Database: D237-240.Rivera et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:123 http:www.biomedcentral.com1471-214810Page 16 of78. Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, Coggill Pc, Sammut SJ, Hotz HR, Ceric G, Forslund K, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer ELL, et al: The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Investigation 2008, 36:D281-D288. 79. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne W.