Cting to significant variations in slope factor, that is an indicationCting to considerable variations in

Cting to significant variations in slope factor, that is an indication
Cting to considerable variations in slope element, which is an indication in the did in reacting to considerable variations in the the slope element, that is an indication of pump malfunction. the pump malfunction. According to the FTA evaluation, the content material of your feed option can lead to reactive crystallization failure. Difficulties within the feed resolution might be on account of prior faults within the technique, as an illustration, inefficient CO2 capture process results in reduce concentrations on the CO2-(aq)within the feed. Figure 12 presents an operating condition exactly where the feed concentration was not in the nominal level of 0.14 mol L-1 0.two mol L-1 of CO2- , and alternatively, water was(aq)AAPK-25 supplier utilized to conduct the experiments. The addition in the non-ionic resolution to the crystallizer containing 1.six g L-1 of CaCl2 resulted inside a continuous decrease within the general electrical existing on the medium, as measured by electrode no. two. The anticipated precipitation time immediately after the begin with the feed pump was 8 min; considering the fact that no calcium chloride is consumedSensors 2021, 21,16 ofsors 2021, 21,throughout the 8-min window, the decrease within the overall electrical present was as a result of an increase within the option volume and not the precipitation process.16 ofFigure 11. Efficiency ofPerformance of various feed pump failure situationsfailure circumstances (case Sensors are separated Figure 11. distinctive sensors through sensors throughout feed pump (case no. 2 in Table 3). no. 2 in Table at 90-deg apart3). Sensors crystallizer. The initial CaCl2 concentration is 1.six g L-1 . The feed flow price is 40 mL min-1 , and inside the are separated at 90-deg apart inside the crystallizer. The initial CaCl concentration is 1.six gL . The feed flow rate is 40 mL min , and mixing speed is 100 RPM. mixing speed is 100 RPM. Table 5. Comparison electrical present more than each of the ML-SA1 site electrodes of the ERT program. the Table five. Comparison of your slope ofof the slope of electrical current over all the electrodes from the ERT program. slope issue, The slope issue, K , istime that the pump is switched pump is switched off,alert based K, is calculated at the calculated at the time that the off, which triggers an which triggers an alert on electrode no. two. Theelectrode no. 2. The data illustrate the malfunction scenarios for and Figures Table 3 and according to data illustrate the malfunction scenarios for case no. 2 in Table three case no. two in 10 and 11. Figures ten and 11.= six.3.1 Min, t1= six.3.1 Min, = eight.1.9 Min, 8.1.9 Min, = 7.two Min, t2 = 7.2 Min, t3 = Slope Aspect, KSlope Factor, K (Pump On) (Pump Off) (Pump On) (Pump On) (Pump On) (Pump Off) Electrode Index 1 two 3 four 5 six 7 eight 9 ten 11 12 13 14 15Electrode Index ( ten )-23.38 2 3 -25.35 four -11.00 five -6.19 six 19.12 7 8 -0.50 9 1.43 10 1.38 11 two.35 12 1.40 13 14 three.08 15 1.86 16 0.16 -2.50 -14.04 -19.C (0-5 ) ) t1 ( 10 -23.38 -3.16 -25.35 -11.00 -1.01 -6.19 -4.71 19.12 -2.98 -0.50 -10.14 1.43 1.38 -4.04 2.35 -3.four 1.40 -5.46 3.08 -4.six 1.86 -3.10 0.16 -2.50 -2.10 -14.04 -2.76 -19.Ct2 K0-5/ ( = )-1.57 -5.00 -4.58 -2.-3.16 7.39 -1.01 -4.71 25.09 -2.98 2.33 -10.14 2.07 -4.04 -1.88 -3.4 -5.46 0.12 -4.6 -0.42 -3.10 -0.25 -2.10 -0.51 -2.76 -0.45 -1.57 -5.00 -1.four -4.58 -0.67 -2.-0.03 0.5 3.06 eight.K=Ct1 /C(t2 10 7.39 -22.98 25.09 2.33-24.87 2.07 -3.15 -1.88 -9.55 0.12 -0.42-5.62 -0.25 0.50 -0.510.659 -0.45 -1.06 -1.four -0.67-1.61 -0.03-2.20 0.5 0.78 three.06 -0.48 eight.-5 ) Ct3 (0 )-0.18 -5.61 -13.39 -21.-22.98 -24.87 -3.15 -9.55 -5.62 0.50 0.659 -1.06 -1.61 -2.20 0.78 -0.48 -0.18 -5.61 -13.39 -21.In accordance with the FTA analysis, the c.