Ryos at E11.5. (A and B) Expression from E11.5 DT

Recent
Ryos at E11.5. (A and B) Expression from E11.5 DT
Recent experimental studies in single cells have shown that gene expression is governed by stochastic process [1,2,3]. Randomness in transcription and translation leads to cell-to-cell variations at both message RNA (mRNA) and protein levels. Following the observation of translational bursts [4,5], single-cell studies demonstrated that gene transcription also occurred in bursts of multiple transcripts separated by relatively long periods of transcriptional inactivity [6,7,8]. The length of inactivity windows varies widely for different genes, from a few minutes in prokaryotic cells to approximately a few hours in eukaryotic cells [6,9]. In addition, varying numbers of gene expression pulses were observed in identical cells that were exposed to the same experimental conditions. The plausible mechanisms underlying transcriptional bursts include stochastic events of chromatin remodeling, existence of pre-initiation complexes, and competition of transcription factories [10,11,12]. However, such stochastic expression events also have certain deterministic properties. For example, the length and amplitude of these bursts are fairly constant in experiments using different extra-cellular stimulations [7]. Although the evidence of transcriptional bursting continues to accumulate, the mechanisms for inducing the bursts are still not fully understood. There are a variety of modeling inhibitor approaches to describe the bursting dynamics of gene expression. Early research works used the Poisson process to generate burst events in transcription and translation instantly [13,14]. Similar approaches, which are called the random telegraph model, have also been used to provideinsightful information regarding the importance of promoter activity [6,14,15,16,17,18]. Another stochastic model assumed that genes switched slowly between active and inactive states and mRNA synthesis occurs only during the active stage [1]. In addition, a more general model was designed to study the effect of process that can give rise to “gestation” and “senescence” period of mRNA birth and decay [19]. Recently, a stochastic model was developed to study the stochastic bursting including agent-like actions in which the slow bursting of the GAL1 gene was explained by a production of an agent-like inhibitor after the induction process causes a refractory state in the promoter [20]. However, recent experimental studies of mRNA distributions have provided 15755315 strong evidence for transcriptional noise beyond what can be described by a simple Poisson process [21]. Therefore more realistic stochastic models are indispensable to investigate the dynamics of burst events accurately. The stochastic simulation algorithm (SSA) represents an essentially exact procedure for numerically simulating the time evolution of a well-stirred reaction system [22]. This simulation method has been extended to study chemical systems with timedependent and non-Markov processes [23]. To investigate the function of noise in slow reactions and multiple step chemical reactions, the delay stochastic simulation algorithm (delay-SSA) was proposed to inhibitor incorporate time delay, intrinsic noise, and discreteness associated with chemical kinetic systems into a single framework [24,25]. The delay-SSA was extended to describe chemical events that have multiple delays and that the time delaysModeling of Memory Reactionsmay be distributed (i.e. random variables) [26]. In recent years, t.Recent
Ryos at E11.5. (A and B) Expression from E11.5 DT
Recent experimental studies in single cells have shown that gene expression is governed by stochastic process [1,2,3]. Randomness in transcription and translation leads to cell-to-cell variations at both message RNA (mRNA) and protein levels. Following the observation of translational bursts [4,5], single-cell studies demonstrated that gene transcription also occurred in bursts of multiple transcripts separated by relatively long periods of transcriptional inactivity [6,7,8]. The length of inactivity windows varies widely for different genes, from a few minutes in prokaryotic cells to approximately a few hours in eukaryotic cells [6,9]. In addition, varying numbers of gene expression pulses were observed in identical cells that were exposed to the same experimental conditions. The plausible mechanisms underlying transcriptional bursts include stochastic events of chromatin remodeling, existence of pre-initiation complexes, and competition of transcription factories [10,11,12]. However, such stochastic expression events also have certain deterministic properties. For example, the length and amplitude of these bursts are fairly constant in experiments using different extra-cellular stimulations [7]. Although the evidence of transcriptional bursting continues to accumulate, the mechanisms for inducing the bursts are still not fully understood. There are a variety of modeling approaches to describe the bursting dynamics of gene expression. Early research works used the Poisson process to generate burst events in transcription and translation instantly [13,14]. Similar approaches, which are called the random telegraph model, have also been used to provideinsightful information regarding the importance of promoter activity [6,14,15,16,17,18]. Another stochastic model assumed that genes switched slowly between active and inactive states and mRNA synthesis occurs only during the active stage [1]. In addition, a more general model was designed to study the effect of process that can give rise to “gestation” and “senescence” period of mRNA birth and decay [19]. Recently, a stochastic model was developed to study the stochastic bursting including agent-like actions in which the slow bursting of the GAL1 gene was explained by a production of an agent-like inhibitor after the induction process causes a refractory state in the promoter [20]. However, recent experimental studies of mRNA distributions have provided 15755315 strong evidence for transcriptional noise beyond what can be described by a simple Poisson process [21]. Therefore more realistic stochastic models are indispensable to investigate the dynamics of burst events accurately. The stochastic simulation algorithm (SSA) represents an essentially exact procedure for numerically simulating the time evolution of a well-stirred reaction system [22]. This simulation method has been extended to study chemical systems with timedependent and non-Markov processes [23]. To investigate the function of noise in slow reactions and multiple step chemical reactions, the delay stochastic simulation algorithm (delay-SSA) was proposed to incorporate time delay, intrinsic noise, and discreteness associated with chemical kinetic systems into a single framework [24,25]. The delay-SSA was extended to describe chemical events that have multiple delays and that the time delaysModeling of Memory Reactionsmay be distributed (i.e. random variables) [26]. In recent years, t.