Nce and one-toone reciprocity. Salient EM manifestations are turn-taking, democratic voting

Nce and one-toone reciprocity. Salient EM manifestations are turn-taking, democratic voting (one person, one vote), in-kind reciprocity, coin flipping, distribution of equal shares, and tit-fortat retaliation. ?The Market Pricing (MP) model is based on a principle of proportionality. ICG-001 web Relationships are organized with reference to socially meaningful ratios and rates, such as prices, cost-benefit analyses or time optimization. Rewards and punishment are proportional to merit. Abstract symbols, typically money, are used to represent relative values. MP relationships are order (-)-Blebbistatin notPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0120882 March 31,2 /A Generic Model of Dyadic Social Relationshipsnecessarily individualistic; for instance, utilitarian judgments seeking the greatest good for the greatest number are manifestations of MP. The four relational models have in common that they suppose a coordination between individuals with reference to a shared model. To these, Fiske adds two limiting cases that do not involve any other-regarding abilities or coordination [1] (pp. 19-20): ?In asocial interactions, a person exploits others and treats them as animate objects or means to an end (as in psychopathy, armed robbery, pillage); ?In null “interactions,” people do not interact at all (they do not actively ignore each other, which still requires a coordination), as can be the case of two inhabitants of the same building who never cross each other’s way or fail to notice each other’s existence, and thus do not adapt their actions to each other. In order to better understand RMT, it is helpful to locate it in the landscape of other social, political and economical theories. Here we follow closely the review made by Senior et al. [15] of this theoretical landscape. RMT is identified as a theory of constrained relativism, which lies between the two extremes of rational choice analysis and poststructuralism. Theories belonging to the two latter domains have dominated political science, sociology and economy for several decades, while constrained relativism has had less influence and is not as widely known. Rational choice theory holds that people are fully rational, follow their self-interest and instantly process all available information. Universal analytical models are thus expected to predict the behavior of these rational agents. At the other extreme, poststructuralism posits that every person, society and epoch, is fundamentally unique. According to that view, no generalization can be made; only descriptions are possible and relevant, without offering any prospect of scientific prediction. Of the two dominant positions, rational choice theory has been favored in many scientific domains, since it calls for the construction of explanatory and predictive models, forbidden by the very definition of poststructuralism. Yet alternatives to rational choice theory are on the rise, as it is apparent that people are strongly (and primarily) influenced by emotions, feelings and subconscious processes. Notably, rational choice theory fails at explaining or predicting major social, economical or political events, such as financial bubbles and crashes, or social and political revolutions. Occupying the middle ground between the two extremes of rational choice theory and poststructuralism, theories of constrained relativism are based on the idea that there is a limited number of elementary ways of organizing social relations that serve as building blocks for the infinitely varied.Nce and one-toone reciprocity. Salient EM manifestations are turn-taking, democratic voting (one person, one vote), in-kind reciprocity, coin flipping, distribution of equal shares, and tit-fortat retaliation. ?The Market Pricing (MP) model is based on a principle of proportionality. Relationships are organized with reference to socially meaningful ratios and rates, such as prices, cost-benefit analyses or time optimization. Rewards and punishment are proportional to merit. Abstract symbols, typically money, are used to represent relative values. MP relationships are notPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0120882 March 31,2 /A Generic Model of Dyadic Social Relationshipsnecessarily individualistic; for instance, utilitarian judgments seeking the greatest good for the greatest number are manifestations of MP. The four relational models have in common that they suppose a coordination between individuals with reference to a shared model. To these, Fiske adds two limiting cases that do not involve any other-regarding abilities or coordination [1] (pp. 19-20): ?In asocial interactions, a person exploits others and treats them as animate objects or means to an end (as in psychopathy, armed robbery, pillage); ?In null “interactions,” people do not interact at all (they do not actively ignore each other, which still requires a coordination), as can be the case of two inhabitants of the same building who never cross each other’s way or fail to notice each other’s existence, and thus do not adapt their actions to each other. In order to better understand RMT, it is helpful to locate it in the landscape of other social, political and economical theories. Here we follow closely the review made by Senior et al. [15] of this theoretical landscape. RMT is identified as a theory of constrained relativism, which lies between the two extremes of rational choice analysis and poststructuralism. Theories belonging to the two latter domains have dominated political science, sociology and economy for several decades, while constrained relativism has had less influence and is not as widely known. Rational choice theory holds that people are fully rational, follow their self-interest and instantly process all available information. Universal analytical models are thus expected to predict the behavior of these rational agents. At the other extreme, poststructuralism posits that every person, society and epoch, is fundamentally unique. According to that view, no generalization can be made; only descriptions are possible and relevant, without offering any prospect of scientific prediction. Of the two dominant positions, rational choice theory has been favored in many scientific domains, since it calls for the construction of explanatory and predictive models, forbidden by the very definition of poststructuralism. Yet alternatives to rational choice theory are on the rise, as it is apparent that people are strongly (and primarily) influenced by emotions, feelings and subconscious processes. Notably, rational choice theory fails at explaining or predicting major social, economical or political events, such as financial bubbles and crashes, or social and political revolutions. Occupying the middle ground between the two extremes of rational choice theory and poststructuralism, theories of constrained relativism are based on the idea that there is a limited number of elementary ways of organizing social relations that serve as building blocks for the infinitely varied.