Erimental observations [13, 96, 103] and the results of the previous works presented by

Erimental observations [13, 96, 103] and the results of the previous works presented by the same authors in which a constant spherical Stattic web configuration has been considered for the cell [67, 69]. It is worth mentioning that the net cell traction force and velocity curves are not presented here since they roughly follow the same trend as the previous work [67].Cell behavior in presence of thermotaxisSeveral experimental studies [18, 19] s11606-015-3271-0 have demonstrated that, in vivo, different cell types are affected by thermal gradient. Here, employing the present model, we investigate that how the cellPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,14 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology GW0742MedChemExpress GW610742 during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Fig 5. Shape changes during cell migration within a substrate with a linear stiffness gradient. The substrate stiffness changes linearly in x direction from 1 kPa at x = 0 to 100 kPa 1471-2474-14-48 at x = 400 m. At the beginning the cell is located at the corner of the substrate near the soft region. The results demonstrate that the cell migrates in the direction of stiffness gradient and the cell centroid finally moves around an IEP located at x = 351 ?5 m. a- The cell at the middle of the substrate, b- the cell final position (see also S1 Video). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gFig 6. Trajectory of the cell centroid within a substrate with stiffness gradient in presence of different stimuli. Examples are run 10 times in order to check consistency of the results. The slop of the cell centroid trajectory reflects the attractivity of every cue to the cell. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,15 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Fig 7. Cell elongation, elong (left axis), and CMI (right axis) versus the cell centroid translocation within a substrate with a pure stiffness gradient. As the cell approaches the intermediate regions of the substrate (rigid regions) both the elong and CMI increase. On the contrary, they decrease near the surface with maximum stiffness because the cell retracts protrusions due to unconstrained boundary surface. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gFig 8. Mean RI (left axis) and IEP position (right axis) of cell in the presence of different cues. The error bars represent mean standard deviation among different runs. Adding a new stimulus to the substrate with stiffness gradient decreases the cell random alignment (increases mean RI) and moves the cell towards the end of the substrate. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,16 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Fig 9. Shape changes during cell migration within a substrate with conjugate linear stiffness and thermal gradients. It is assumed that there is a linear thermal gradient in x direction (as stiffness gradient) which changes from 36 at x = 0 to 39 at x = 400 m. At the beginning the cell is located at a corner of the substrate near the surface with lower temperature. The results demonstrate that the cell migrates along the thermal gradient towards warmer region. Finally, the cell centroid moves around an IEP located at x = 359 ?3 m. When the cell centroid is near the IEP the cell may send out and retract protrusions but it maintains the position around IEP. a- The cell at the middle of the substrate, b- the cell final position (see also S2 Video). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gcan sense and respond to t.Erimental observations [13, 96, 103] and the results of the previous works presented by the same authors in which a constant spherical configuration has been considered for the cell [67, 69]. It is worth mentioning that the net cell traction force and velocity curves are not presented here since they roughly follow the same trend as the previous work [67].Cell behavior in presence of thermotaxisSeveral experimental studies [18, 19] s11606-015-3271-0 have demonstrated that, in vivo, different cell types are affected by thermal gradient. Here, employing the present model, we investigate that how the cellPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,14 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Fig 5. Shape changes during cell migration within a substrate with a linear stiffness gradient. The substrate stiffness changes linearly in x direction from 1 kPa at x = 0 to 100 kPa 1471-2474-14-48 at x = 400 m. At the beginning the cell is located at the corner of the substrate near the soft region. The results demonstrate that the cell migrates in the direction of stiffness gradient and the cell centroid finally moves around an IEP located at x = 351 ?5 m. a- The cell at the middle of the substrate, b- the cell final position (see also S1 Video). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gFig 6. Trajectory of the cell centroid within a substrate with stiffness gradient in presence of different stimuli. Examples are run 10 times in order to check consistency of the results. The slop of the cell centroid trajectory reflects the attractivity of every cue to the cell. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,15 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Fig 7. Cell elongation, elong (left axis), and CMI (right axis) versus the cell centroid translocation within a substrate with a pure stiffness gradient. As the cell approaches the intermediate regions of the substrate (rigid regions) both the elong and CMI increase. On the contrary, they decrease near the surface with maximum stiffness because the cell retracts protrusions due to unconstrained boundary surface. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gFig 8. Mean RI (left axis) and IEP position (right axis) of cell in the presence of different cues. The error bars represent mean standard deviation among different runs. Adding a new stimulus to the substrate with stiffness gradient decreases the cell random alignment (increases mean RI) and moves the cell towards the end of the substrate. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094 March 30,16 /3D Num. Model of Cell Morphology during Mig. in Multi-Signaling Sub.Fig 9. Shape changes during cell migration within a substrate with conjugate linear stiffness and thermal gradients. It is assumed that there is a linear thermal gradient in x direction (as stiffness gradient) which changes from 36 at x = 0 to 39 at x = 400 m. At the beginning the cell is located at a corner of the substrate near the surface with lower temperature. The results demonstrate that the cell migrates along the thermal gradient towards warmer region. Finally, the cell centroid moves around an IEP located at x = 359 ?3 m. When the cell centroid is near the IEP the cell may send out and retract protrusions but it maintains the position around IEP. a- The cell at the middle of the substrate, b- the cell final position (see also S2 Video). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122094.gcan sense and respond to t.